北大MBA原文案例庫(kù)

  文件類別:其它

  文件格式:文件格式

  文件大?。?9K

  下載次數(shù):57

  所需積分:2點(diǎn)

  解壓密碼:qg68.cn

  下載地址:[下載地址]

清華大學(xué)卓越生產(chǎn)運(yùn)營(yíng)總監(jiān)高級(jí)研修班

綜合能力考核表詳細(xì)內(nèi)容

北大MBA原文案例庫(kù)
How Financial Firms Decide on Technology,介紹國(guó)際大銀行在決定對(duì)信息技術(shù)投資時(shí)的考慮要點(diǎn)和他們具體的實(shí)施過 程。 How Financial Firms Decide on Technology (Abstract) The financial services industry is the major investor in information technology(IT) in the U.S. economy; the typical bank spends as much as 15% of non-intereste expenses on IT. A persistent finding of research into the performance of financial institutions is that performance and efficiency vary widely across institutions. Nowhere is this variability more visible than in the outcomes of the IT investment decisions in these institutions. This paper presents the results of an empirical investigation of IT investment decision processes in the banking industry. The purpose of this investigation is to uncover what, if anything, can be learned from the IT investment practices of banks that would help in understanding the cause of this variability in performance along with pointing toward management practices that lead to better investment decisions. Using PC banking and the development of corporate Internet sites as the case studies for this investigation, the paper reports on detailed field-based surveys of investment practices in several leading institutions How Financial Firms Decide on Technology (Part One) |信息技術(shù)對(duì)金融服務(wù)業(yè)的影響正在增加,不僅僅表現(xiàn)在銀行的15%無息開 | |支上,而且對(duì)金融服務(wù)業(yè)的運(yùn)做和戰(zhàn)略也有很強(qiáng)的影響。    | |  一個(gè)對(duì)金融機(jī)構(gòu)的長(zhǎng)期研究表明,不同的機(jī)構(gòu)的效率和表現(xiàn)也不同。| |其決定的因素有以下一些其中的一個(gè)因素就是對(duì)投資的決定和管理。SBS | |是一個(gè)失敗的例子,但是成功的公司也不少。本文注重解答以下的問題:| | | | ?。?銀行對(duì)IT投資的評(píng)估和管理過程?    | |  2.在對(duì)IT的管理過程中,理論和實(shí)際操作的結(jié)合如何?    | | ?。?IT投資的管理和銀行性能的關(guān)系如何? | |[pic] | 1.0 Introduction   Information technology(IT) is increasingly critical to the operations of financial services firms. Today banks spend as much as 15% of non- interest expense on information technology. It is estimated that the industry will spend at least $21.1 billion on IT in 1998, and financial institutions collectively account for the majority of IT investment in the U.S. economy. In additon to being a large component of the cost structure, information technology has a strong influence on financial firms operatons and strategy. Few financial products and services exist that do not utilize computers at some point in the delivery process, and a firms’information systems place strong constraints on the type of products offered, the degree of customization possible and the speed at which firms can respond to competitive opportunities or threats.   A persistent finding of research into the performance of financial institutions is that performance and efficiency varies widely across institutions, even after controlling for factors such as size(scale), product breadth(scope), branching behavior and organizational form(e.g. stock versus mutual for insurers; banks versus saving & loans). Given the central role that technology plays in these institutions, at least some of this variation is likely to be due to variations in the use and effectiveness of IT investments. While some authors have argued that the value of IT investment has been insignificant, particularly in services, recent empirical work has suggested that IT investment, on average, is a productive investment. Perhaps more importantly, there appears to be substantial variation across firms; some firms have very high investments but are poor performers, while otheres invest less but appear to be much more successful. Brynjolfsson and Hitt found that as much as half the returns to IT investment are due to firm specific factors.   One potentially important driver of differences in IT value, and of firm performance more broadly, is likely to be the decision and management peocessed for IT investments. Horror stories of bad IT investment decisions abound. Consider the example of the new strategic banking system(SBS) at Banc One(American Banker 1997). Banc One Corp. and Electronic Data Systems Corp. agreed last year to end their joint development of this retail banking system after spending an estimated $175 million on it. As stated in the American Banker article, SBS"was just so overwhelming and so complete that by the time they were getting to market, it was going to take too long to install the whole thing," said Alan Riegler, principal in Ernst & Young’s financial services management consulting division. However, not all the stories are negative. New IT systems are playing a vital role in reshaping the delivery of financial services. For example, new computer- telephony integration(CTI) technologies are transforming call center operations in financial institutions. By investing in technology, more and more institutions are moving operations from high-cost branch operations to the telephone channel,where the cost per transaction is one-tenth the cost of a teller interaction. This IT investment not only reduces the cost of serving existing customers, but also extends the reach of the institution beyond its traditional geographic boundaries.   In this paper, we utilize detailed case studies of six retail banks to investigate several interrelated questions:  ?。?What processes do banks utilize to evaluate and manage IT investments?  ?。?How well do actual practices align with theoretical arguments about how IT investments should     be managed?   3.What impact does that management of IT investments have on performance? How Financial Firms Decide on Technology (Part Two) For the first question, we develop a structured framework for cataloging IT investment practices and then populate this framework using a combination of surveys and semi-structured interviews. We then compare the results of this exercise with a synthesis of the literature on IT decision making to understanding how practices vary across firms and the extent to which this is consistent with "best practices" as described in previous literature. Finally, we will compare these processes to internal and external performance metrics to better understand which sets of practices appear to be most effective.   To make these comparisons concrete, we examine both the general decision process as well as the specific processes used for two recent IT investment decisions :the adoption of computer-based home banking (PC banking), and the development of the corporate web site. These decisions were chosen because they were recent and are related but provide some contrast; in particular, PC banking is a fairly well defined product innovation, while the corporate web presence is more of an infrastructure investment which is less well-defined in terms of objectives and business ownership.   Overall, we find that while some aspects of the decision process are fairly similar across institutions and often conform to "best practice" as defined by previous literature, there are several areas where there is large variation in practice among the banks and between actual and theoretical best practice. Most banks have a strong and standardized project management for ongoing systems projects, and formal structures for insuring that line-managers and systems people are in contact at the initiation of technology projects. At the same time, many banks have relatively weak processes(both formal and informal) for identifying new IT investment opportunities, allocating resources across organizational lines, and funding exploratory or infrastructure projects with long term or uncertain payoffs.   The reminder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the previous literature on performance of financial institutions and the effects of IT on performance. Section 3 describes the methods and data. Section 4 describes the current academic thinking on various components of the decision process and compares that to actual practices at the banks we visited. Section 5 describes the results of our in-depth study of PC banking projects and the summary, Section 6 contains a similar analysis for the Corporate Web Site and discussion and conclusion appear in Section 7. How Financial Firms Decide on Technology (Part Three) 2.0  Previous Literature 2.1  Performance of Financial Institutions   There have been a number of studies that have examined the efficiency of the banking industry and
北大MBA原文案例庫(kù)
 

[下載聲明]
1.本站的所有資料均為資料作者提供和網(wǎng)友推薦收集整理而來,僅供學(xué)習(xí)和研究交流使用。如有侵犯到您版權(quán)的,請(qǐng)來電指出,本站將立即改正。電話:010-82593357。
2、訪問管理資源網(wǎng)的用戶必須明白,本站對(duì)提供下載的學(xué)習(xí)資料等不擁有任何權(quán)利,版權(quán)歸該下載資源的合法擁有者所有。
3、本站保證站內(nèi)提供的所有可下載資源都是按“原樣”提供,本站未做過任何改動(dòng);但本網(wǎng)站不保證本站提供的下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性;同時(shí)本網(wǎng)站也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的損失或傷害。
4、未經(jīng)本網(wǎng)站的明確許可,任何人不得大量鏈接本站下載資源;不得復(fù)制或仿造本網(wǎng)站。本網(wǎng)站對(duì)其自行開發(fā)的或和他人共同開發(fā)的所有內(nèi)容、技術(shù)手段和服務(wù)擁有全部知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),任何人不得侵害或破壞,也不得擅自使用。

 我要上傳資料,請(qǐng)點(diǎn)我!
 管理工具分類
ISO認(rèn)證課程講義管理表格合同大全法規(guī)條例營(yíng)銷資料方案報(bào)告說明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)管理戰(zhàn)略商業(yè)計(jì)劃書市場(chǎng)分析戰(zhàn)略經(jīng)營(yíng)策劃方案培訓(xùn)講義企業(yè)上市采購(gòu)物流電子商務(wù)質(zhì)量管理企業(yè)名錄生產(chǎn)管理金融知識(shí)電子書客戶管理企業(yè)文化報(bào)告論文項(xiàng)目管理財(cái)務(wù)資料固定資產(chǎn)人力資源管理制度工作分析績(jī)效考核資料面試招聘人才測(cè)評(píng)崗位管理職業(yè)規(guī)劃KPI績(jī)效指標(biāo)勞資關(guān)系薪酬激勵(lì)人力資源案例人事表格考勤管理人事制度薪資表格薪資制度招聘面試表格崗位分析員工管理薪酬管理績(jī)效管理入職指引薪酬設(shè)計(jì)績(jī)效管理績(jī)效管理培訓(xùn)績(jī)效管理方案平衡計(jì)分卡績(jī)效評(píng)估績(jī)效考核表格人力資源規(guī)劃安全管理制度經(jīng)營(yíng)管理制度組織機(jī)構(gòu)管理辦公總務(wù)管理財(cái)務(wù)管理制度質(zhì)量管理制度會(huì)計(jì)管理制度代理連鎖制度銷售管理制度倉(cāng)庫(kù)管理制度CI管理制度廣告策劃制度工程管理制度采購(gòu)管理制度生產(chǎn)管理制度進(jìn)出口制度考勤管理制度人事管理制度員工福利制度咨詢?cè)\斷制度信息管理制度員工培訓(xùn)制度辦公室制度人力資源管理企業(yè)培訓(xùn)績(jī)效考核其它
COPYRIGT @ 2001-2018 HTTP://m.fanshiren.cn INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 管理資源網(wǎng) 版權(quán)所有